For the past 20 years, Donna Grant, my writing partner, and I have been writing novels, seven in total—the eighth in the works. No Pulitzer or Nobel winners, but well crafted stories that have enlightened and entertained tens of thousands of readers. Our first “big book” Tryin’ to Sleep in the Bed You Made was published in 1997, has never been out of print, is in its fifth edition and has sold over 750,000 copies, without any major advertising or endorsements.
But that was then.
Now, at the end of 2009 we, along with many of our “classmates,” find our careers in jeopardy. This precarious position is not because we write bad books, but because we all fall in the general category “African American Fiction” and we just aren’t selling as well as our “street-lit” sisters and brothers. What we write is women’s fiction with Af-Am characters–stories of struggle and triumph, loss, coping, love, and life, learning. But we are labeled, handicapped, before we’re out of the gate. Those who are expecting urban lit are disappointed, and those (white folks) who might enjoy our work because the theme might be relevant to their life -like What Doesn’t Kill You, our last book, a funny story about a woman who loses her job after 25 years— don’t ever see the book because it’s in “that” section and they aren’t going “there.”
Then we have the recent “Afro Picks” Publisher’s Weekly cover featuring works of African American authors, further indicating our separate place in the market, pointing out our status as ‘other.’ PW, in its defense, said the cover (http://www.publishersweekly.com/toc-archive/2009/20091214.html) was intended to be amusing, clever “a delightful and wry expression of historical Afro Americana.” What, like the Gold Dust Twins and Buckwheat? Yes, Felicia Pride’s lead article was insightful and important. All of that however was overshadowed by the furor and controversy caused by selecting a cover that so clearly marginalizes the writers who were intended to benefit (we hope) from the piece.
A few years ago we visited a book club meeting—as authors, it has become a pretty common way to spend an afternoon or evening. One of the founding members had read our latest book, proposed it to the group which made it their monthly selection, then contacted us via our website. We arrived at the home of the hosting member and were greeted with hugs by women who were eager to welcome their first real live authors. There was food, wine and plenty of enthusiastic questions about our book, our lives and our writing process– absolutely typical of the dozens of book club meetings we have attended—except for the first time, we were the only African Americans present.
Did this make a difference? Should it have? We were writers. They were readers, but we were certainly aware this was an unusual event. The members of the First Wednesday Book Club of Morristown, NJ liked our work, identified with our characters and couldn’t understand why, when they found the book to have such a universal appeal, most of the information they could find about us focused on our being African American. In fact, they were so intent on “getting the word out” about us that they invited their local paper to cover the meeting. And surprisingly our visit seemed newsworthy enough for the Daily Record of Morris County to send a reporter and photographer and actually run the story.
When an African American writer or entertainer achieves success with a wider (read: white) audience, a la Will Smith or Terry McMillan, they are said to have crossover appeal. Why isn’t the reverse true? When blacks watch CSI, Transformers or pick up the latest John Grisham, no one attributes that to crossover. Is it assumed that everyone will find these diversions entertaining? That race doesn’t matter as long as it’s white? That blacks, Mexicans, Chinese, Lakota Sioux, Lebanese and whomever else the census separates out will “get” the storyline and generate the dollars requisite for success? We had our very own experience with this years ago when a major studio was interested optioning the film rights to our book, Tryin’ to Sleep in the Bed You Made. They loved the book, said it was a universal story about friendship and coming of age and that they wanted to make the main characters white instead of black. It never occurred to them that their idea was both insulting and stupid.
Even in the racially diverse Grey’s Anatomy, the central character, intern Meredith Grey, is a white woman, despite the fact series writer/producer Shonda Rhimes is African American. Happenstance or economics?
In our first novel, Exposures, we “wrote white.” Why? At the time it was a matter of expediency—we wanted to get published. Neither of us had attempted a novel. We needed to see if we could wrangle all those words into a coherent, entertaining story, or if we were suffering from English major’s syndrome—the misguided notion that you have a novel or two in you. Also, there was not much precedent for co-written fiction, so we had to find out in a hurry whether we could write together without drawing blood. At the time there was no ready outlet for African American contemporary fiction and we decided that was one more experiment than we could run simultaneously, so we did not add the black variable. Popular writing wisdom is/was to “write what you know,” so since we met while working in the fashion business, Exposures is set in that world. Our heroine is a young female fashion photographer of Swedish heritage, and the story is a tale of friendship, family secrets, betrayal, love, loss and the search for self and family, themes we have continued to explore in our later work. The novel sold well enough in its original publication as a Warner/Popular Library paperback to warrant translation into Spanish and Russian so we had answered the first of our questions.
It took a lot longer to find a home for our first book with black characters. At the time we didn’t fit the established categories (we weren’t Toni or Terry), so many editors didn’t believe we would find an audience—they were wrong. We have now made a name for ourselves writing about the challenges and triumphs of people living their everyday lives. Our stories don’t center on the role that race plays in our character’s circumstances—for those of us who are black in America that is a given, but not always the focus, much as it is for our characters.
Are these situations silent testimony to the more refined racism that lives with us everyday—the kind of de facto pecking order largely unrecognized by those who perpetuate it, and unchallenged by those of us who are aware, but just grateful to be in the game? Maybe it’s not so silent. The movie Crash asked questions about who we are and what we think about all those “other” people. There was awkward, knowing, embarrassed laughter in the theater when the not so secret little prejudices so many people bury under several layers of politeness, fear and political correctness were laid bare.
Not so long ago, a white reader (one of many who identify themselves that way) emailed to say how much she enjoyed one of our books, but wondered if she was welcome to read our work since she wasn’t black. We were stunned by the question, but it spoke to the segregated reading habits which are more the norm than we would like to admit. Are we so tired of dealing with each other at work, in the supermarket, on the bus, that it’s a relief to open a book and find people with strange accents and hairdos banished from our fictional world? Or is it more insidious? Are books our mirrors, and we only look for reflections of ourselves?
Shouldn’t reading provide a window to the greater world? We read Anna Karenina without being Russian, The 100 Secret Senses without being Chinese, Catcher in the Rye without being teenage prep school boys, Shelters of Stone without being Cro-Magnon—Anne Rice without being a vampire. We delight in Carl Hiassen without being Floridians, Sandra Cisneros with no experience of being Latinas from Chicago, understand the plight of a Nigerian girl as told by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, never having set foot in Lagos. Since childhood we have read thousands of books about people who didn’t look like us and found them enlightening, hilarious, heartbreaking, and know, without doubt, we are better people because of it.
Why then is it so surprising when works of fiction, save for “literary” efforts like those of Alice Walker and Edward P. Jones, which mostly recount our collective, tragic, post middle passage history, cross over? Are we to believe that as fully franchised, contemporary Americans living a variety of social, educational, and economic circumstances that our stories are so foreign as to be incomprehensible? That we share no universal human truths?
After the surprise success of Tryin’ to Sleep in the Bed You Made, which featured drawings of two brown-skinned women on the cover, our publisher made a conscious effort to cross over our next book. That cover was stylized and beautiful–dominated by a house flanked by a lush tree. Our three main characters were rendered the size of carpenter ants, their color indistinguishable. So, to appeal to a wider audience we had to lose face? What must we sacrifice to be palatable to the culture at large?
Some bookstores even have separate African American areas. Is this to make us more comfortable in unfamiliar territory like a book store? Does this highlight our work, or let other people know they can skip this aisle? Granted, some argue that having a unique section celebrates the black experience. But are they really separate but unequal niches, a publishing ghetto with very different real estate values? “Why I Don’t Want to Be the Next Amy Tan” by Celeste Ng (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/celeste-ng/why-i-dont-want-to-be-the_b_342340.html) shows the problem goes beyond black and white.
Until Waiting to Exhale made publishers understand that black people buy books, we were mostly left outside the gates. Clearly the decision makers in the publishing world slept through the unit in American history that explains that slaves risked and often lost their lives to learn to read. The Exhale phenomenon is the reason many of us were given a chance. Walter Mosley reached a wider readership thanks to the endorsement of President Clinton.
Would The Help by Kathryn Stockett have received so much attention if a black writer wrote about her mother or aunt who actually were “the help?” Would The Blind Side have done as well at the box office if (as most often happens) Michael Oher’s aunt or third cousin took him in?
Author Bernice McFadden (Sugar, Nowhere is a Place, This Bitter Earth) calls it Seg-Book-Gation (http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/trends/segbookgation_in_publishing_144019.asp)
and the first anniversary of Carleen Brice’s (Children of the Waters, Orange Mint and Honey) December is National Buy a Book by a Black Author and Give it to Somebody Not Black Month (http://welcomewhitefolks.blogspot.com/) and my Open Letter to Oprah (http://twomindsfull.blogspot.com) speak to a situation that is becoming more dire, not improving.
Is it really so hard to throw open our windows and get some fresh air? Browse a bookstore section you usually pass without Oprah to lead the way? Ask a librarian or a co-worker for a recommendation; that’s how many non-black readers found our work. You might discover a good read on an unexpected shelf—maybe gain insight into someone else, or surprisingly, yourself.
————– End Guest Blog Post ——————-
Thank you to Donna & Virginia. What are your thoughts on having a separate African American literature section? Check back tomorrow where I will have a follow up interview.
-Nick
Subscribe
I got my copy of 
